-
Recent Posts
- Talking about RFC 9424 – Indicators of Compromise (IoCs) and Their Role in Attack Defence
- PowerShell Basic Introduction (Security Version)
- Improving Technical Interviews
- AnyDesk Forensic Analysis and Artefacts
- Log4J/Log4Shell Video Glossary
- HatsOffSecurity on YouTube
- How to Create a Good Security CTF
- NoScript Plugin Forensic Investigation – Firefox/ToR Browser
- Keybase.io Forensics Investigation
- When is Index.dat not Evidence of Browsing
Categories
- anydesk
- Attack
- Browser Forensics
- Brute force
- Chrome
- Competition
- Competitions
- Containment
- Content Delivery Manager
- Cookies
- Cryptography
- CTF
- Cyber
- Cyber Security Challenge
- Decoding Time
- Encrypted Traffic
- Firefox
- Forensic Readiness Plan
- General
- Google Analytics
- Google Chrome
- Google Rapid Response
- Group Policy
- GRR
- Hardening
- Heartbleed
- Identification
- Incident Response
- Internet Explorer
- Interviews
- Introduction
- IoCs
- Jump Lists
- Keybase
- Link FIles
- Linux Forensics
- Memory Forensics
- Microsoft Edge
- My Two Cents
- Network Analytics
- Network Forensics
- pass the hash
- PCAP Analysis
- Pen Testing
- PowerShell
- Preparation
- Protocol
- ReadyBoost
- Research
- Safari
- SANS
- Shared Folders
- Shellshock
- SMB
- SSH
- TOR
- Uncategorized
- USB Forensics
- Windows Forensics
- Windows Registry Forensics
- Windows Registry Forensics
- Windows Spotlight
- Windows XP
- Wireshark
CyberLinks
- Follow Hats Off Security on WordPress.com
Daily Archives: January 14, 2018
SMB2 – File/Directory Metadata
Using SMB it is possible to retrieve data that is typically only expected when carrying out host based forensics. The MACB (Modification, Access, Change and Birth) data is sent across regardless of if a file is accessed or not. With … Continue reading
Posted in Network Analytics, Network Forensics, SMB
Tagged hats off security, Network Forensics, SMB
1 Comment
Hats Off Security 