Hats Off Security
-
Recent Posts
- How to Create a Good Security CTF
- NoScript Plugin Forensic Investigation – Firefox/ToR Browser
- Keybase.io Forensics Investigation
- When is Index.dat not Evidence of Browsing
- HTTP Methods
- Wireshark – More Basics
- Decrypting Traffic in Wireshark
- Identifying Sites in Encrypted Traffic
- SMB2 Protocol Negotiation
- SMB2 – File/Directory Metadata
Categories
- Attack
- Browser Forensics
- Brute force
- Chrome
- Competition
- Competitions
- Containment
- Content Delivery Manager
- Cookies
- Cryptography
- CTF
- Cyber
- Cyber Security Challenge
- Decoding Time
- Encrypted Traffic
- Firefox
- Forensic Readiness Plan
- General
- Google Analytics
- Google Chrome
- Google Rapid Response
- Group Policy
- GRR
- Hardening
- Heartbleed
- Identification
- Incident Response
- Internet Explorer
- Introduction
- Jump Lists
- Keybase
- Link FIles
- Linux Forensics
- Memory Forensics
- Microsoft Edge
- My Two Cents
- Network Analytics
- Network Forensics
- pass the hash
- PCAP Analysis
- Pen Testing
- Preparation
- Protocol
- ReadyBoost
- Research
- Safari
- SANS
- Shared Folders
- Shellshock
- SMB
- SSH
- TOR
- Uncategorized
- USB Forensics
- Windows Forensics
- Windows Registry Forensics
- Windows Registry Forensics
- Windows Spotlight
- Windows XP
- Wireshark
CyberLinks
- Follow Hats Off Security on WordPress.com
- My Tweets
Daily Archives: October 29, 2018
Identifying Sites in Encrypted Traffic
There is some mis-information around; that encrypted traffic is useless, and you should go back to netflow and statistical analysis only. I disagree. I will be doing a few posts showing clear-text information leakage we can use to our advantage. … Continue reading
Posted in Encrypted Traffic, Network Analytics, Network Forensics
Tagged artefact locations, basics, cyber security, hats off security, Network Forensics, PCAP, SSL, TLS
Leave a comment
